POLITSCI'14 Conference will be held during December 10-12, 2014 at Istanbul University organized by DAKAM (Eastern Mediterranean Academic Research Center).
The main objective of the Political Science Conference is to provide a platform for academic discussions on politics by taking into account both "theory" and "praxis". This year's conference will focus primarily on neoliberalism and its impact on various aspects of the social body: forms of state, social classes, accumulation and political regimes, rationalities of government, social resistance movements, gender regimes etc. The conference will also focus on the questions of contemporary political theory and problematize political science as a discipline. The conference aims to constitute a forum for prolific exchanges between different theoretical perspectives, interests and concerns prevalent within political science.
CFP welcome papers based on original researches that will broaden our insights into the field of political science. We encourage submission of abstracts derived from papers in other disciplines, hoping to engage in inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary dialogues that will be helpful for adding to our understanding of what political theory may mean for people today living in rapidly changing national, social and cultural contexts. Our hope is to initiate fruitful discussions for expanding the horizons of political theory which aims to overcome the limits of traditional boundaries, mainstream perspectives and concerns.
Framework of the Conference:
After the financial crisis and the great recession that started in the US in 2007 to become subsequently global and the Eurozone crisis, there emerged a debate as to the fate of neoliberal agenda and its ability to provide solutions to the crisis tendencies of capitalism. Governments were providing emergency bailouts to the banking sector and significant stimulus packages to others. Therefore, it was thought that the free market doctrine and its components of deregulation and austerity have approached to an end. Commentators such as Naomi Klein, Joseph Stiglitz and Eric Hobsbawn argued that there were similarities between the financial crash and the fall of the Berlin Wall. However, ensuing developments showed that rather than leading to the dismantling of the neoliberal structuring, the crises have provided another stimulus for a neoliberal re-structuring. Neoliberalism seems to be more resilient than it was thought to be.
Neoliberalism as a political rationality has a long history and its roots lie within the liberal art of government. Throughout the twentieth century, its two main variations crystallized as ordoliberalism in Germany in the 1930s and the Chicago School in the USA in the 1970s. Neoliberalism in its ordoliberal form converged with state power in Germany in the aftermath of the Second World War and the version produced by the Chicago School was first put to trial in Chili in the 1970s. However, following the global economic crisis of the 1970s, this rationality gradually acquired global dominance, shaped hegemonic discursive formations and turned into variegated political projects in numerous social formations as a result of domestic class struggles which ended in favor of the capital, especially its financial fraction. This process incorporated structural adjustment programs and shock therapies for some states under the coordination of the World Bank and IMF; others followed their desires to emulate the hegemonic centers of global capitalism such as the US and the UK and their needs for adjustment to global capitalism.
Different social formations followed different neoliberalization paths producing variegated results that depended on the legacy of social relations established previously. This restructuring processes in different social formations displayed certain common features. They can be succinctly described as the extension of market-oriented rationality and commodification processes into previously insulated realms of social life. This also incorporated a conservative turn particularly based on a "law and order" rhetoric. Consequently, ubiquitous results have emerged. Some of them can be listed as the following: the rights and the wages of the labor have been curtailed; flexibilization in work conditions has been imposed leading to pervasiveness of precarious jobs; social spending has been reduced along with efforts to maintain fiscal discipline; workfare rather than welfare has been promoted; the regime of poverty aid has replaced the social policy system based on rights; privatization in social services such as education, healthcare etc. has speeded up; penal apparatuses have been strengthened to repress social opposition, eliminate risks and govern poverty; new governmental technologies have been developed to construct prudential "free" subjects taking responsibility to control their own risks; urban transformation projects were put into practice in cities creating gentrified zones along with exclusionary zones... Yet these processes have also been marked by protests, resistance movements, occupations and riots such as the anti-globalization movements and occupy movements.
This conference is about the latest phase of neoliberalism. After the roll-back phase of the 1980s and the roll-out phase of the 1990s, there seems to emerge another phase in the neoliberalization process.
Therefore, the main questions can be formulated as the following:
a) Are new "systems of meaning" emerging under late neoliberalism to tackle with the problems caused by the economic crises and if so, what are their contents?
b) How have the accumulation regimes been recalibrated after the great recession?
c) How have neoliberal institutions, policies and ideologies been transformed in the last 10 years?
d) What are the new dynamics within state forms, regulatory frameworks and governmental techniques? What kind of new state forms have been emerging? Can we talk of a sweeping tendency towards new forms of authoritarianism? What are the effects of political crises on political regimes under late neoliberalism? What kind of new political rationalities and hegemonic projects have emerged in the 2000s?
e) What are the changing terms of global trade and financial regime? How do the role of global institutions change? Are there new policy instruments and agendas of global institutions? What are the dynamics of "fast policy" transfer under late neoliberalism?
f) What are new techniques in the government of poverty? What are new trends in the opposition between rights-based approach to social policy and the approach based on poverty aids? Are citizenship regimes under late neoliberalism becoming more exclusive or more inclusive?
g) What are the new dynamics in urban restructuring processes under late neoliberalism? What are new forms of class struggles fought over the urban space? What are new forms of urban marginality? What are the new dynamics in social resistance movements?
h) Are gender regimes going through changes under late neoliberalism? What are the new dynamics concerning the relations between gender, politics and space? How are the identities of women, LGBTs and men been re-constructed under late neoliberalism?
i) What are the new dynamics and new governmental technologies in the penal sphere under late neoliberalism? Do we experience the emergence of a repression-surveillance network? Can we name the new state form as the "security state"? How does the legal sphere serve neoliberal states to repress social opposition under late neoliberalism?
Themes
Social Classes and Late Neoliberalism
Neoliberalism in the post-crisis Period: States and Changing Accumulation Regimes
Changes in State-Capital Relations
The Impact of Economic Crises in late 2000s on Middle Classes
State Crises, Regime Crises and Neoliberal Governmentality
State Forms under Transition, New Regulatory Frameworks and Hegemonic Projects
New State Forms and New Governmental Techniques
Political Regimes/Political Crises under Late Neoliberalism and Authoritarian Tendencies
Crises of Political Hegemony and New Political Rationalities in 2000s
Global Capitalism and Global Institutions (the IMF, World Bank, World Trade Organization etc.)
Changing Terms of the Global Trade and Financial Regime
Changing Role of Global Institutions
New Policy Instruments and Agendas of Global Institutions
The dynamics of "fast policy" transfer under Late Neoliberalism
Social Policy and the New Regulatory Frameworks for Poverty
New Techniques in the Government of Poverty
Rights-based Approach to Social Policy vs. the Approach Based on Poverty Aids: New Trends
Exclusive vs. Inclusive Citizenship Regimes under Late Neoliberalism
Urban Space, Class Struggles and Social Resistance Movements under Late Neoliberalism
Power, Sovereignty and Resistance in the Urban Space
New Forms of Class Struggles
Theory, Action and Social Protests
Urban Marginality
Gender Regimes under Late Neoliberalism
Gender, Politics and Space
Women, Poverty and New Regulatory Frameworks
Queer Politics and Neoliberalism
Reconstructing Manhood under Late Neoliberalism
State and Repression-Surveillance Network
State, Coercion and Social Control
The State and Surveillance Network
Security State, the "State of Emergency" and the Legal Sphere
Politics of Time, Space and Memory under Late Neoliberalism
Politics of Urban Restructuring under Late Neoliberalism
Cultural Heritage and Sites of Memory
Politics of Memory
Problematizing Politics as a Discipline
Epistemological discussions
Debates on Methodology in Politics
New interdisciplinary Approaches to Political Science
Teaching Difficult and/or Controversial Subjects
Research and teaching politics
Prof. Jamie Peck will be the keynote speaker of the conference.
The deadline for submitting abstracts was September 5, 2014 but it has been extended for three weeks.
For more information please visit website