When reading a context, we will definitely get certain concept from it but If we take a look at the words of the same text individually, we will understand the meaning apart from the meaning of the whole sentence. Buildings inside the city are like the arrangement of these words within the sentence. When in at the streets and alleys we look at the buildings one by one , is like a time we look at the words separately in a sentence and sometimes is impossible to understand whole concept of the sentence ( here means the city we live) and presumably we hardly feel connection between words . Look at pictures , will see buildings(objects) are fixed in the city and indeed in all the pictures objects are the same objects in other pictures and just the position of the subjects have been changed. And the subject's perception of objects in picture (1) with perception of the same object in picture (3) is completely different , A flying crow in the sky will understand the various mental images of the nature and relationship between objects. As a result, we will see that always changing the structure of objects does not change our understanding of that object, but only by changing the position of the subjects can the same difference in the formation of a different mental image. When dealing with the subject of interior design, humans are usually placed in the center of space and in a fixed position relative to the walls of the building, As in cities, people are among the alleys and streets between them, and they have less opportunity to understand the generalities of the city and the relations of the buildings in it as a whole like a crow We want to know if the opportunity created by changing the subject to the object in the above illustrations can be obtained in the interior design of the building as a small scale generalization?With the difference that once words within a sentence have been replaced by buildings within the city, and now the rooms will be replaced within a building.
2017
Mehdi rasouli - Fariba goodarzi