Cover image: Mladen Stilinovic, "Conversations with Freud," 
1982. Image courtesy of the artist.

e-flux journal issue 54 out now with Keti Chukhrov, Boris Groys, Ana Ofak,Geert Lovink, Ross Wolfe, Walid Raad,Stephen Squibb, and E. C. Feiss

www.e-flux.com/issues/54-april-2014 

e-flux journal iPad edition is now available.Free download here.

Spring is here, so we are naturally thinking about sex all the time. It was a busy winter with many personal calamities and meltdowns, and this only makes now a better time to think about sex. Big beautiful interspecies sex. Instrumentalized sex. Makeup sex and breakup sex. Overman sex and that business with the eunuch. Tender Marvin Gaye sex and also the weird stuff. Sex as the symbolic drainage area for desires that exceed and escape the society, but also as the visceral pelvic thrust behind those desires that glue the whole contraption together when it is actually hopelessly falling apart. Because we all know the fear of sex, and most of us have spent too much time close to a military or imperial or populist regime bent on regulating or functionalizing it. Keep it minimal, because this kind of intimacy mashes subject and object relations together in a way that makes governance confusing if not impossible.

In order to stabilize power, it is absolutely necessary to keep sex cordoned off and in its place because of how it switches and mutually erases notions of emancipation and enslavement, which is after all why sexual practices and codes can be such a terrifyingly direct line to how deeply emancipation and enslavement have been inscribed into the most minute practices of a person. Just on the level of muscle movements, you can detect an emancipated citizen lapsing into the most severe or infantile brutality, and the most repressed can freely express all the tenderness that is usually systematically foreclosed in every other part of the day or in every other part of the city. Sex is where classes switch roles just for kicks and gender can forget itself. In it, you can only be a conduit for codes of submission and domination that were written into your being at some point by history, ancestry, upbringing, star sign—and even though you can never change the fact that you will always be a macho entitled fuckhead or a generous submissive who stores all that hardship on a remote server, you can rewrite yourself through role play with another person.

Even if sex has been celebrated as a means for collectives to be formed by desire rather than by birthright, we know by now that it is too unstable to use as a base to construct any kind of lasting structure, and will rather always work as a force of entropy that exceeds attempts to capture and limit its flows within any stabilization mechanism. Sex now joins with a parliament of abstract and unruly forces that are integral to logics of class, capital, power, and property relations, but that also overflow their terms and compromise their command at every turn. It will always be the most visceral metaphor for what cannot be contained, just like the change of seasons. Which is why spring can only make us think about how there are things that you guess and things that you know, boys you can trust and girls that you don't, about the little things you hide and the little things you show. Sometimes you think you're gonna get it but you don't, and that's just the way it goes.(1)

—Julieta Aranda, Brian Kuan Wood, Anton Vidokle

In this issue:

Keti Chukhrov—Sexuality in a Non-Libidinal Economy
The argument goes, since sexuality is the epitome of liberation, and since sexuality can never be absent from any society, sexuality is always at least latently embedded in any society as the potential for freedom—freedom from prejudices, power, control, and so forth. However, judging by statistical data, the rate of sexual intercourse under socialism may have been even higher than under capitalism.

Boris Groys—Poetics of Entropy: The Post-Suprematist Art of Mladen Stilinovic
The artist rejects any attempt to give this drift toward anarchy and chaos any definite direction, to let it culminate in any new order. Socialism collapses. Capitalism triumphs. But the process of entropy goes on. Stilinovic now demystifies money as he had earlier demystified party language. After all, money is also merely images, signs among other signs.

Ana Ofak—Gentleman Next Door: Antonio G. Lauer, a.k.a. Tomislav Gotovac, and the Man Undressed in Times of Socialism
On the cover, Gotovac superimposed a shot of himself holding open his trench coat—a glowing five-pointed star cut out of his forehead—over the letters T-O-M. His exposed penis dangles neatly below the Glen Miller T-shirt he is wearing. This Tom character—a cinephile punk—is joined by three other portraits inside the paper: Tom the security agency worker, Tom the pinup, and Tom the superhero. They all pay homage to the absurd adventures of a country facing its brutal fall, while still enjoying the last convulsions of socialism.

Geert Lovink—Hermes on the Hudson: Notes on Media Theory after Snowden
In 2014, we're torn between the seductive aspect of coming together and the fear that we are consciously producing evidence that will be used against us. Let's move away from the binary logic of online/offline, of participation/exodus, and instead design other forms of social interaction and organization together, based on sustainable exchanges, strong ties, and a sensual imagination that allows us to transcend the given cultural formats (from edu-factory formats to Facebook).

Ross Wolfe—Repetition-Compulsion: World-Historical Rhythms in Architecture
Repetition in architecture today, as in every other cultural sphere, attests to the historical impasse at which society has lingered for almost a century. Architects find themselves forced to recycle, reorder, and repeat novelties of the past in order to remain "cutting-edge" in the present. No longer does the steady march of technological progress provide a path for architecture to follow. 

Walid Raad—Index XXVI: Red
If, like me, you have experienced telepathic reception, then you know that you can never trust telepathic signals, because telepathic signals are always accompanied by something else. They are always accompanied by telepathic noise.

Stephen Squibb—Genres of Capitalism, Part II
Absent the awareness of the different levels of analysis at work in political economy, "capitalism" inevitably elevates distinct and conflicting relations within and between the modes of consumption, circulation, production, and distribution, confusing them with an overwhelming para-natural force: the creation of surplus value, or what I have called "alchemy." The result is that, in one way or another, every "capitalism" is always already a spiritualism, a mystification that places the actual levers of collective emancipation out of reach.

E. C. Feiss—Response to Grant Kester's "The Device Laid Bare"
Kester's text leaves more troubling questions unaddressed: Who can "see" shifts in power? Just as you cannot "see," or for that matter witness, the workings (and embedded hierarchies) of a right, as Brown's work so adeptly lays out, I would argue that attempting a diachronic analysis, as Kester calls for, must start with how the project articulates its own demands.

> via e-flux